Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Tekle Senay & Anor v Mulsanne Insurance Company Limited

24 May 2024
[2024] EWCC 12
County Court
A taxi driver's personal injury claim was found to be dishonest. The question was whether his other claims (for car damage etc.) also had to be thrown out. The judge decided only the dishonest claim was thrown out because that's what the law actually says, even though some judges previously thought differently.

Key Facts

  • Road traffic accident involving Mr. Senay (taxi driver) and Mr. Obadi (passenger) vs. Mulsanne Insurance Company.
  • Liability admitted for the accident.
  • Claims for personal injury, vehicle damage, recovery/storage, credit hire (Senay), and personal injury (Obadi).
  • Finding of fundamental dishonesty against Mr. Senay regarding his personal injury claim.
  • Dispute regarding the effect of section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 on Mr. Senay's non-personal injury claims.
  • Lack of clear binding authority on the interpretation of section 57 in this context.

Legal Principles

Section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 governs the dismissal of personal injury claims in cases of fundamental dishonesty.

Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, Section 57

The interpretation of statutory provisions should consider the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used. If ambiguous, Parliamentary materials may be considered (Pepper v Hart).

Pepper v Hart [1993] AC 593

Outcomes

Mr. Senay's personal injury claim dismissed due to fundamental dishonesty.

Section 57 of the 2015 Act, as interpreted by the court, only mandates the dismissal of the 'primary claim' (personal injury claim), not other related claims.

Mr. Senay's claims for vehicle damage, recovery/storage, and loss of use are successful.

The court found that Section 57 does not extend to the dismissal of claims other than those directly related to the personal injury claim found to be fundamentally dishonest, which are considered distinct heads of loss stemming from the same breach of duty.

Mr. Obadi's personal injury claim successful; awarded £5,575.

Not explicitly discussed in detail; presumed based on successful claim.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.