Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

CDE v Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust

14 November 2023
[2023] EWCA Civ 1330
Court of Appeal
A baby suffered brain damage due to hospital delays. The court agreed there was a mistake in how the judge decided whether those delays caused the injury, so they sent the case back for a more detailed look at whether even a small delay could have made a difference.

Key Facts

  • Claimant suffered severe brain injury around the time of her delivery on 4 June 2018.
  • Injury resulted from a short period of near-total hypoxic ischaemic injury (PHI).
  • Claimant alleges negligent care caused delays in delivery, contributing to the injury.
  • Key delay involved failure to transfer mother to labour ward promptly after a decision to do so at 16:50.
  • CTG monitoring was not started until 17:50, delaying detection of foetal bradycardia.
  • Consultant obstetrician, Miss Nicks, heard bradycardia at 17:51 and entered the room at 17:52.
  • Claimant argued that if CTG had been in place earlier, Miss Nicks would have heard the bradycardia at 17:50 and acted immediately, resulting in a one-minute earlier delivery.
  • Judge found that even with earlier detection, the same outcome would likely have occurred due to the underlying vascular malformation.

Legal Principles

Bolam test: A medical professional is not negligent if they acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men.

Bolam v Frien Hospital [1957] 1 WLR 582

Bolitho test: The court must be satisfied that the opinion relied upon has a logical basis, considering comparative risks and benefits.

Bolitho v City and Hackney HA [1998] AC 232

Causation in medical negligence: The claimant must prove that the breach of duty caused the injury.

Bolitho v City and Hackney HA [1998] AC 232

Outcomes

Appeal allowed in part.

The judge erred in applying the Bolam test instead of the Bolitho test regarding the consultant obstetrician's actions. A one-minute earlier delivery would have resulted if the CTG had been operational earlier. The case was remitted to the same judge for further expert evidence on whether a one-minute reduction in PHI would have materially affected the claimant's injuries.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.