JTI Acquisitions Company (2011) Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC
[2023] UKUT 194 (TCC)
Unallowable purpose rule in s.441 CTA 2009: Loan relationships debits are disallowed if attributable to a purpose not amongst the company's business or commercial purposes. A tax avoidance purpose is unallowable if it is the main or one of the main purposes.
Corporation Tax Act 2009, sections 441 and 442
Tax advantage (s.1139 CTA 2010): Includes relief from, repayment of, or avoidance/reduction of tax.
Corporation Tax Act 2010, section 1139
Transfer pricing rules (Part 4 TIOPA): Tax calculations should be based on arm's length provisions. If actual provision confers a potential tax advantage, profits/losses are recalculated as if arm's length provision was used.
Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010, sections 147, 148, 152, 155, 174
Interaction between transfer pricing and loan relationships: Amounts imputed under transfer pricing rules are treated the same as actual profits, losses, or interest under Part 5 CTA 2009.
Corporation Tax Act 2009, section 446
Determining unallowable purpose: Focuses on the company's subjective purposes; considers the intentions of relevant decision-makers (typically the board). Effects, even if inevitable, are not necessarily purposes; however, some consequences are so inextricably involved they must be a purpose.
BlackRock Holdco 5, LLC v HMRC [2024] EWCA Civ 330 and Travel Document Service v HMRC [2018] EWCA Civ 549
Tax advantage in Sema: A better position vis-à-vis the Revenue, covering situations where liability is reduced or a payment is due from the Revenue.
IRC v Sema Group Pension Scheme Trustees [2002] EWCA Civ 1857
Just and reasonable apportionment (s.441(3) CTA 2009): Objective exercise based on relevant purposes; fact-specific.
BlackRock Holdco 5, LLC v HMRC [2024] EWCA Civ 330
Appeal dismissed.
The Court of Appeal found the FTT correctly applied the unallowable purpose rule. The Appellants' purpose in participating in the debt reorganization was to secure a tax advantage by generating interest deductions offset by Speedy 1's existing losses, effectively creating 'net' deductions and reducing the overall group tax liability. The transfer pricing rules were not relevant as they were not considered in the decision-making process. The FTT's apportionment was also correct.
[2023] UKUT 194 (TCC)
[2024] EWCA Civ 652
[2024] UKFTT 998 (TC)
[2024] EWCA Civ 365
[2024] EWHC 1081 (Ch)