Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Oluremi Akim Agbaje v The Robert Frew Medical Company Limited

[2023] EWCA Civ 702
Dr Agbaje sued a company for the value of his shares after being unfairly removed from a business. The judge gave him the value of the shares plus extra interest and costs. The Court of Appeal said the agreement didn't actually require the company to pay him until he gave up his share certificate, which he never did. Therefore, he only gets the share value, and the company gets most of its court costs back.

Key Facts

  • Dr Agbaje, a former partner in Robert Frew Medical Practice (Partnership), was expelled in 2009.
  • The Partnership's property was owned by RFMCL, in which partners held shares under a 2006 agreement.
  • The agreement contained pre-emption provisions for transferring a leaving member's shares.
  • A dispute arose over the value of Dr Agbaje's shares following their transfer in 2011.
  • The High Court valued the shares at £21,188 as of April 2009.
  • RFMCL appealed against the subsequent orders for interest and costs.

Legal Principles

Section 35A(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 allows for the inclusion of simple interest in judgments for debt or damages.

Senior Courts Act 1981

The meaning of 'debt' in the context of Section 35A(1) is broad, covering sums recoverable under contract or statute.

The Aldora [1978] QB 748; BP Exploration Co (Libya) Ltd v Hunt (No 2) [1982] 2 AC 352

A claim for a declaration of entitlement to a sum of money is not necessarily a claim for debt recovery under Section 35A(1).

Odyssey Aviation Ltd v GFG 737 Ltd [2019] EWHC 1980 (Comm)

Outcomes

Appeal against the interest order allowed.

The judge's reasoning was based on incorrect premises; RFMCL did not concede non-compliance with the agreement, nor conversion of shares; no debt was owed to Dr Agbaje until share certificate delivery per the agreement.

Appeal against the costs order allowed.

The judge's starting point that Dr Agbaje was the successful party was incorrect; the valuation issue was determined in RFMCL's favour; the judge's reasoning on offers and conduct was inadequate.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.