Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

R v Anandarajah Bremakumar

10 May 2023
[2023] EWCA Crim 545
Court of Appeal
A man was given a too-short prison sentence for repeatedly abusing a 13-year-old girl he knew. A higher court increased his sentence because the original one didn't consider all the bad things he did and the harm he caused.

Key Facts

  • The offender, a 61-year-old man, was convicted of four counts of sexual activity with a 13-year-old girl (AB), the daughter of close friends.
  • The offences occurred over three weeks during the school summer holidays.
  • The offender was sentenced to 30 months' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently, plus a 10-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order and a Restraining Order.
  • The Attorney General referred the sentence as unduly lenient under section 36 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.
  • The offender held a position of trust within their temple community.
  • AB suffered severe psychological harm as a result of the abuse.
  • The offender had two previous convictions for non-sexual offences.

Legal Principles

Sentencing for sexual offences against children, considering aggravating and mitigating factors, and the totality principle.

Sentencing Council Guideline for Sexual Offences

Reporting restrictions under the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992.

Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992

Attorney General's power to refer unduly lenient sentences.

Criminal Justice Act 1988

Outcomes

The Court of Appeal granted leave to refer the sentence.

The original sentence did not adequately reflect the seriousness of the offences and the harm caused to the victim, failing to apply the totality principle correctly.

The Court of Appeal quashed the original sentence of 30 months' imprisonment on count 4 and substituted a sentence of four years' imprisonment.

An uplift was necessary to reflect the four counts of offending and the severity of the harm caused. The Court found the original sentence unduly lenient.

The victim surcharge order was quashed as unlawful.

The offending predated the relevant victim surcharge provisions.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.