R v Auriol Grey
[2024] EWCA Crim 487
Murder requires proof that the defendant unlawfully assaulted the victim, the assault was a substantial cause of death, and the defendant intended to kill or cause really serious harm.
Judge's directions to the jury
The actus reus (guilty act) and mens rea (guilty mind) are separate considerations in determining guilt.
Court of Appeal judgment
Appeal against conviction dismissed.
The Court of Appeal found that the judge's directions to the jury were not erroneous. The central dispute concerned the appellant's intent (mens rea), not whether the assault caused death (actus reus), which was admitted. The judge's comments on the potential stamp to the arm were within the context of assessing intent. The jury's verdict was deemed safe.