R v Akbat Arbati
[2024] EWCA Crim 589
Sentencing for offences under section 24(D1) of the Immigration Act 1971 should consider the statutory maximum sentence (four years), previous case law (lack thereof), and analogous offences.
Sentencing Council's General guideline; the Imposition guideline; guideline on Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea
The predominant purpose of sentencing in such cases is public protection; deterrence carries limited weight due to the circumstances of offenders.
Court of Appeal judgment
Aggravating factors include relevant previous convictions, high levels of planning, and a history of unsuccessful immigration applications. Mitigating factors include absence of convictions, good character, young age, coercion, and arguable asylum claims.
Court of Appeal judgment
The appeal was dismissed.
The Court of Appeal found no error of principle in considering the applicant's immigration history as an aggravating factor. They held that the sentence of eight months (following a 12-month starting point reduced for a guilty plea) was not manifestly excessive given the circumstances.