Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

R v Daniel Kovalkov

[2023] EWCA Crim 1217
A young man's sentence for drug dealing and fighting is being reviewed because the judge didn't properly consider his age and the fact he was a victim of modern slavery. The court needs more information before deciding whether to change the sentence.

Key Facts

  • Daniel Kovalkov, born August 6, 2005, pleaded guilty to four offences at age 16.
  • Offences included drug supply (Class A and B) and two counts of affray.
  • Sentenced to 30 months detention (cocaine supply), 12 months concurrent (cannabis), 12 months consecutive (affray), and 8 months concurrent (affray).
  • Appeal based on insufficient consideration of age and circumstances, and Part 10 of the Sentencing Act 2020.
  • R v ZA [2023] EWCA Crim 596, handed down after sentencing, highlighted inadequacies in the sentencing judge's approach.
  • Pre-sentence report recommended a YRO but not a YRO with ISS.
  • Kovalkov was found to be a victim of modern-day slavery, potentially relevant to sentencing.
  • Kovalkov's solicitor stated he did not want the modern slavery aspect explored at the sentencing hearing.

Legal Principles

Custodial sentences for children and young people should be a measure of last resort.

Sentencing Children and Young People Guidelines, paragraph 6.42

If the custody threshold is crossed for a child or young person, the court must consider a YRO with ISS before imposing a custodial sentence. If a YRO with ISS cannot be imposed, the court must explain why.

R v ZA [2023] EWCA Crim 596, paragraph 82(7)

Outcomes

Appeal adjourned pending further information.

The court lacked sufficient information to determine the appropriate sentence. The sentencing judge did not adequately consider Kovalkov's age, circumstances, and the relevant guidelines, particularly in light of R v ZA. Information regarding the modern slavery finding is also needed.

Addendum to pre-sentence report ordered.

To provide the court with information on adult sentencing options equivalent to a YRO with ISS, and details of the modern slavery finding and its relevance to the case.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.