R v Jonathan Da Silva
[2023] EWCA Crim 1624
Sentencing for coercive or controlling behaviour under s.76 Serious Crime Act 2015
Sentencing Council’s definitive guideline for controlling or coercive behaviour
Sentencing for intentional strangulation under s.75A(1)(a) Serious Crime Act 2015
R v Cook [2023] EWCA Crim 452
Sentencing for assault occasioning actual bodily harm under s.47 Offences Against the Person Act 1861
Sentencing Council guideline 'assault definitive guideline'
Overarching Principles: Domestic Abuse
Sentencing Council’s guideline
Community order requirements under s.208(10) and (11) Sentencing Act 2020
Sentencing Act 2020 and R v Gregson, R v Singh
Totality principle in sentencing
Not explicitly stated but implicitly used throughout the judgment
Suspended sentences under s.277 Sentencing Act 2020
Sentencing Act 2020
The appeal was allowed.
The original sentence was unduly lenient and did not adequately reflect the seriousness of the offences.
The community order was quashed.
Immediate custody was the appropriate sentence given the severity and nature of the offences.
A 3-year concurrent sentence was imposed on each count.
This sentence was considered the minimum appropriate to reflect the totality of the offences and ensure consistency with sentencing guidelines.
Hartland was ordered to surrender to custody by 2 pm.
To begin serving his sentence.
The sentence was deemed to start on the date of the appeal hearing.
To avoid time between the original sentencing and the appeal not counting toward time served.