Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

R v Michael John Harris

26 April 2023
[2023] EWCA Crim 528
Court of Appeal
A man was given a long prison sentence for not telling the police about changes in his life, as required by law because of past crimes. The court decided the punishment was too harsh because the risk of him hurting anyone wasn't as high as the judge thought, so they lowered his sentence.

Key Facts

  • Appellant (aged 48) sentenced to 32 months' imprisonment for five offences of failing to comply with sex offender notification requirements (Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 91(1)(a) and (2)).
  • Offences involved non-disclosure of bank account, credit card, and two social media accounts over a 22-month period, and failure to register a weekend address.
  • Previous convictions for similar offences in 2013 and 2018, and a breach in 2017 dealt with by caution.
  • Appellant pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity.
  • Sentencing judge assessed culpability as level A (highest) and harm as level 1 (highest) based on police assessment of high risk.
  • Appeal based on incorrect harm categorization and excessive sentence.

Legal Principles

Sentencing Council Guidelines for failure to comply with notification requirements.

Sentencing Council Guidelines

Totality principle in sentencing.

Sentencing Guidelines

Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 91(1)(a) and (2): Failure to comply with notification requirements.

Sexual Offences Act 2003

Outcomes

Appeal allowed.

Court found insufficient evidence to support the sentencing judge's conclusion that the breaches risked very serious harm or distress. Harm was recategorized as level 2, not level 1.

Sentence for the first offence quashed and replaced with 2 years and 4 months' imprisonment.

Original sentence of 4 years (pre-discount) deemed manifestly excessive for Category 2A offence. Adjusted sentence reflects aggravating factors but considers the harm level correctly.

Sentences for offences 2 to 5 remain unaffected.

The appeal focused only on the sentence for the first offence and the categorization of harm.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.