Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

R v Michael Stainer

12 December 2023
[2023] EWCA Crim 1656
Court of Appeal
A man was convicted of tax fraud for not paying over £473,000 in taxes he'd deducted from his employees' wages. He appealed, claiming mistakes were made at trial and his sentence was too harsh. The appeals court disagreed, saying the trial was fair and the sentence was justified given the crime's severity. His appeal was dismissed.

Key Facts

  • Michael Stainer convicted of two counts of cheating the Public Revenue and one count of fraud by false representation.
  • Offences related to non-payment of income tax and National Insurance contributions.
  • Stainer owned The Grand Folkestone Limited, employing 50 staff.
  • He deducted PAYE tax and NI contributions but didn't pay them to HMRC.
  • Total loss to HMRC exceeded £473,000.
  • Stainer sentenced to 3 years' imprisonment (concurrent) and disqualified from being a company director for 3 years.
  • Appeal against conviction and sentence was refused by a single judge.
  • Stainer sought leave to appeal and introduce fresh evidence (witness statement and administrator's report).

Legal Principles

The sole test for this court is whether the convictions are unsafe.

Court of Appeal Criminal Division

Sentencing guidelines for Revenue fraud and fraud were applied.

Sentencing Guidelines

The court considers whether the sentence is manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.

Court of Appeal Criminal Division

The maximum sentence that may lawfully be suspended is 2 years' imprisonment.

Prosecution of Offences Act 1985

Outcomes

Appeal against conviction refused.

No merit in arguments regarding withheld material, HMRC misconduct, judge's summing-up, or jury misconduct. Fresh evidence deemed inadmissible.

Appeal against sentence refused.

Judge correctly applied sentencing guidelines, considered mitigating factors (age, good character), and sentence not manifestly excessive.

Application for extension of time refused.

Would serve no purpose.

Order for Stainer to pay court costs (£283.92).

Under Section 18(6) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.