Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

R v Oris Tomney

[2024] EWCA Crim 101
A man with a long history of crime got a suspended sentence instead of jail time because he's finally stopped using drugs and is trying to turn his life around. The judge didn't explain his decision well enough, but the appeals court agreed that a suspended sentence was better than jail in this case to keep the man from going back to crime.

Key Facts

  • Otis Tomney (41) convicted of burglary (26 November 2021) and two counts of possession of Class A drugs with intent to supply and possession of a bladed article (29 December 2020).
  • Sentenced to two years' imprisonment suspended for two years with a thinking skills program and a 20-day rehabilitation activity requirement.
  • Extensive criminal record: 31 convictions for 120 offences, including numerous burglaries.
  • At the time of the offences, Tomney was a drug addict receiving benefits.
  • Tomney claimed at trial (falsely) that he had stolen the drugs and was looking for a friend during the burglary.
  • Pre-sentence report indicated a medium risk of re-offending and harm, but also noted progress in addressing drug addiction with the help of an opioid blocker.

Legal Principles

Minimum term for burglary under section 314 of the Sentencing Code.

Sentencing Act

Consideration of whether a custodial sentence or a suspended sentence better protects the public.

Sentencing Guidelines

Relevant considerations for determining whether it is unjust to impose a minimum term include the realistic prospect of rehabilitation.

Offence-Specific Guidelines

Outcomes

The Attorney General's reference was dismissed.

The Court of Appeal found that the judge was entitled to find that it was unjust to impose the minimum three-year term for burglary, given Tomney's progress in addressing his drug addiction and the prospect of rehabilitation. The court considered that a suspended sentence better protected the public in this case.

Leave to refer the sentence was granted.

The judge's explanation for finding it unjust to impose the minimum term was deemed insufficient.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.