Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

R v Rupert Earl-Ocran

16 August 2024
[2024] EWCA Crim 1031
Court of Appeal
A man fired a gun from his balcony. He was sentenced for having an illegal gun and for having a gun to scare people. The court said the sentence was fair, but made a small change to how the sentence was legally written so it was correct.

Key Facts

  • Appellant (age 29) fired three shots from a handgun from a balcony into the street.
  • Appellant called 999 anonymously reporting gunshots.
  • Police recovered a converted 9mm blank-firing pistol from appellant's flat.
  • Appellant had eight previous convictions, including robbery and drug offences.
  • Appellant claimed he fired shots to scare men he believed were threatening him.
  • Psychiatric report indicated paranoid, antisocial, and emotionally unstable personality disorder, possibly linked to cannabis abuse.

Legal Principles

Sentencing for possession of a prohibited firearm under section 5(1)(aba) of the Firearms Act 1968.

Firearms Act 1968

Sentencing for possessing a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence under section 16A of the Firearms Act 1968.

Firearms Act 1968

Minimum sentence provisions under section 311 of the Sentencing Act 2020.

Sentencing Act 2020

Dangerous offender provisions and extended sentences under the Sentencing Act 2020, Schedule 18.

Sentencing Act 2020, Schedule 18

Appeals against sentence; the Court of Appeal's role in reviewing sentencing decisions.

Criminal Appeal Act 1968, section 11(3)

Outcomes

Appeal against the length of the custodial sentence and the finding of dangerousness was dismissed.

The judge's assessment of dangerousness was supported by the evidence, and the sentence was not manifestly excessive.

The original sentences were quashed.

The extended sentence was applied incorrectly; dangerousness provisions did not apply to the possession of a prohibited firearm offence.

New sentences were imposed: five years' imprisonment for possession of a prohibited firearm; eight-year extended sentence (six years custody, two years extension) for possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence.

This corrected the legal error while maintaining the overall length of the sentence.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.