Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

R v Shakeel Janjua

16 January 2024
[2024] EWCA Crim 32
Court of Appeal
A man got a 7-year prison sentence for dangerous driving and drug offences. The judge didn't explain the sentence properly and didn't consider the total sentence length. The appeal court reduced it to 5 years and 9 months because it was too long.

Key Facts

  • Appellant (26) sentenced to 7 years' imprisonment for various offences (dangerous driving, drug possession, failure to surrender).
  • Offences committed across three indictments (Birmingham, Wolverhampton, Lincoln).
  • Appellant had a prior record including robbery, firearm possession, assault, and dangerous driving.
  • Offences committed while on licence for previous offences.
  • Appellant absconded after being charged and before sentencing.
  • Appeal concerns the length of the sentence and the lack of explanation in the sentencing remarks.

Legal Principles

Judges must explain how sentences, particularly lengthy ones, are calculated.

R v Bailey [2020] EWCA Crim 1719

Sentencing for multiple offences requires express regard to the Sentencing Council Guideline on Totality.

Sentencing Council Guideline on Totality

Totality requires a judge to consider whether the overall sentence is just and proportionate, not simply adding individual sentences.

Sentencing Council Guideline on Totality

Outcomes

Appeal allowed; sentence reduced.

The original sentence was manifestly excessive due to incorrect calculations and failure to consider totality. The court adjusted individual sentences and made one consecutive sentence concurrent.

Birmingham indictment sentence unchanged (21 months).

The individual sentences within this indictment were not deemed excessive.

Lincoln indictment sentence (3 months) made concurrent instead of consecutive.

Both failures to surrender stemmed from the same absconding period.

Wolverhampton indictment sentences reduced.

To reflect totality, the drug offences sentence was reduced from 3 years 6 months to 3 years and the dangerous driving sentence from 18 months to 12 months.

Overall sentence reduced from 7 years to 5 years and 9 months.

The original 7-year sentence was deemed manifestly excessive.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.