Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust & Anor

11 April 2024
[2024] EWCOP 20
Court of Protection
A man with a serious leg infection needed an amputation to survive. He was mentally unwell and couldn't decide for himself. The court, after considering his wishes and the medical advice, decided the amputation was the best thing for him.

Key Facts

  • GF, a 60-year-old man with paranoid schizophrenia, was admitted to the hospital with severely infected leg ulcers.
  • Medical professionals recommended an above-the-knee amputation as the only viable treatment option to prevent death from sepsis.
  • GF lacked capacity to make decisions about his care and treatment due to his mental illness.
  • GF's family members supported the amputation.
  • The court considered GF's wishes and feelings, but ultimately prioritized his best interests.

Legal Principles

Presumption of capacity

Mental Capacity Act 2005, s.1(2)

Burden of proof for incapacity

Mental Capacity Act 2005, s.2(4)

All practicable steps to assist in decision-making must be taken

Mental Capacity Act 2005, s.1(3)

Unwise decisions do not automatically equate to incapacity

Mental Capacity Act 2005, s.1(4)

Best interests determination

Mental Capacity Act 2005, s.1(5), s.4

Principle of least restriction

Mental Capacity Act 2005, s.1(6)

Definition of incapacity

Mental Capacity Act 2005, s.2(1)

Best interests considerations

Aintree v James [2013] UKSC 67

Sanctity of life

Airedale Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789

Litigation capacity

An NHS Trust v P [2021] EWCOP 27

Outcomes

GF lacked capacity to make decisions about his care and treatment, including the amputation.

His paranoid schizophrenia impaired his ability to understand, retain, and weigh relevant information regarding his condition and treatment options.

The above-the-knee amputation was deemed lawful and in GF's best interests.

It was the only viable option to prevent death from sepsis, considering the medical evidence, GF's expressed wish to live, and his family's support.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.