Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

A McDermott v Sellafield Ltd & Ors.

28 April 2023
[2023] EAT 60
Employment Appeal Tribunal
A consultant claimed unfair dismissal after writing a critical report. The judge said she wasn't unfairly fired, but made a mistake in deciding who had to pay the legal fees. A new judge will decide about the fees.

Key Facts

  • Mrs. A McDermott, an EDI consultant, contracted with Sellafield Ltd (Respondent 1) via her company.
  • Following anonymous sexual harassment allegations, McDermott was asked to conduct focus group interviews.
  • McDermott advocated for a formal investigation instead.
  • McDermott's report criticized the HR team's dysfunctionality.
  • The Respondents terminated McDermott's contract.
  • McDermott claimed protected disclosure detriment and victimisation.
  • The Employment Tribunal dismissed all claims and awarded costs to Respondents.
  • McDermott appealed the liability and costs decisions.

Legal Principles

Definition of Qualifying Disclosure

Employment Rights Act 1996, section 43B(1)

Protected Disclosure Detriment

Employment Rights Act 1996, section 48(1)

Victimisation

Equality Act 2010, section 27

Victimisation of Contract Workers

Equality Act 2010, section 41

Liability of a Principal for Agent's Actions

Equality Act 2010, sections 109, 111, 112; Ministry of Defence v Kemeh [2014] ECA Civ 91

Causation in Protected Disclosure Claims

NHS Manchester v Fecitt [2011] EWCA Civ 1190

Protected Act - Doing Anything for the Purposes of the Equality Act

Equality Act 2010, section 27(2)(c)

Costs Awards in Employment Tribunals

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, rules 76, 78, 84

Outcomes

Liability Appeal Dismissed

While the Tribunal erred on some points, the errors did not affect the overall conclusion that McDermott did not suffer protected disclosure detriment or victimisation.

Costs Appeal Allowed

The Tribunal's costs awards were unsafe due to errors in the liability decision and an overstated assessment of McDermott's case's meritlessness.

Costs Applications Remitted to a New Tribunal Panel

To ensure fairness and confidence in the outcome, given the Tribunal's strong initial view on the meritlessness of McDermott's claim.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.