M Jarosinski v Nestle UK Ltd
[2023] EAT 157
A Tribunal may reconsider a judgment if necessary in the interests of justice.
Rule 70, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
The interests of justice include finality in litigation; a 'second bite of the cherry' is unusual.
Rule 70 and case law interpretation
Reconsideration is appropriate for procedural mishaps preventing fair case presentation, not correcting legal errors (better addressed by EAT).
Case law interpretation
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed.
The EJ improperly reconsidered the judgment, failing to assess the interests of justice and deciding on a new basis not argued for.
EJ's original judgment reinstated.
The reconsideration was inappropriate given the lack of procedural mishap and the availability of an EAT appeal on the contractual interpretation.
EJ's reconsideration on the breach of implied term of trust and confidence deemed inappropriate.
This was not part of the reconsideration application; the EJ went beyond the scope of the application.