Key Facts
- •Local Authority (MCC) applied for care orders for five children (S, L, LX, N, AX).
- •Father (F) was found guilty of multiple counts of rape and assault of S.
- •Mother (M) pleaded guilty to failing to protect S from abuse.
- •Both parents were also found guilty of perverting the course of justice.
- •Threshold was agreed, and there was no opposition to final care orders.
- •Local Authority also sought discharge of Father's parental responsibility and a Section 91(14) order.
Legal Principles
Child's welfare is paramount.
Children Act 1989, section 1(1)
Presumption of parental involvement furthering child's welfare.
Children Act 1989, section 2A and 2B
Court's power to make orders regarding contact with children in care.
Children Act 1989, section 34
Court's power to discharge parental responsibility for an unmarried father.
Children Act 1989, section 4(2A)
Section 91(14) orders to restrict future applications to court.
Children Act 1989, section 91(14) and section 91A
Outcomes
Care orders granted for all five children.
Threshold was crossed, and neither parent was capable of caring for the children.
Section 34(4) orders made for both parents.
To allow the Local Authority flexibility in managing contact, given the circumstances.
Father's parental responsibility discharged.
Father's inability to meet children's needs and the risk of harm posed by his continued involvement.
Section 91(14) orders made for the duration of the children's childhoods.
To protect the children from the destabilising effects of future applications by the father.