Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Sanchia Berg & Anor v The London Borough of Tower Hamlets & Ors

10 May 2024
[2024] EWFC 92
Family Court
A journalist wanted court records from a case about a woman who was unfairly put in a secure unit as a child. The judge decided to release the records because it's important for the public to know what happens in family court and the woman wanted to share her story. The decision also gives advice on how to handle similar situations in the future.

Key Facts

  • Application by BBC journalists for transcripts and documents from previous family court proceedings concerning Ms Codsi, who was subject to deprivation of liberty orders as a child.
  • Ms Codsi, now an adult, supports the application and wishes to share her story.
  • The application raises issues of public interest reporting, Article 8 (right to private and family life) and Article 10 (freedom of expression) rights.
  • The court considered the balance between Ms Codsi's right to privacy and the public interest in transparency of the family courts.
  • The court had to consider Section 97 of the Children Act 1989 and Section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960 regarding confidentiality in family proceedings.

Legal Principles

Confidentiality in Children Act 1989 proceedings

Section 97, Children Act 1989

Confidentiality in proceedings relating to children's upbringing

Section 12, Administration of Justice Act 1960

Balancing Article 8 (right to private life) and Article 10 (freedom of expression) rights

Re S (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593

Proportionality test in balancing human rights

JXMX v Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust [2015] EWCA Civ 96

Importance of freedom of expression in a democratic society

Human Rights Act 1998, Section 12(4)

Open justice and public scrutiny of the courts

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms and Another [2000] 2 AC 115; Re BBC [2015] AC 588

Duties and responsibilities of the press in relation to Article 10

Financial Times v UK (2010) 50 EHRR 46

Provision of transcripts of proceedings

FPR 2010 r.27.9

Communication of information relating to proceedings

FPR 2010 r.12.73

Outcomes

Granted permission for applicants to receive transcripts of hearings and relevant documents.

Balanced Article 8 and Article 10 rights, finding that the public interest in transparency and Ms Codsi's wish to share her story outweighed privacy concerns. The court also noted the importance of open justice in the family court system, especially concerning the use of DoLS orders and the lack of transparency surrounding the care of vulnerable children.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.