Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

AJ Rayson Ltd v The Pensions Regulator

30 May 2024
[2024] UKFTT 463 (GRC)
First-tier Tribunal
A company didn't meet its legal obligations for workplace pensions. They were fined £400. They appealed, saying they didn't get the letters, but the judge said they should have known about the rules anyway and upheld the fine. The judge said being late in doing the right thing doesn't cancel the fine.

Key Facts

  • A J Rayson Limited (Employer) failed to provide a declaration of compliance with automatic enrolment duties under the Pensions Act 2008.
  • The Pensions Regulator issued a Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN2) of £400 for non-compliance.
  • The Employer challenged the FPN2, claiming non-receipt of correspondence due to a change of registered office address.
  • The Tribunal considered the matter on the papers.
  • The Employer's duties start date was 19 December 2022; the deadline for compliance was 18 May 2023.

Legal Principles

Employers have legal obligations regarding automatic enrolment under the Pensions Act 2008.

Pensions Act 2008, section 40

The Regulator can issue a Compliance Notice and then a Fixed Penalty Notice for non-compliance.

Pensions Act 2008, section 40

A person issued with a Fixed Penalty Notice can appeal to the Tribunal after applying for a review by the Regulator.

Pensions Act 2008, section 44

The Tribunal's role is to decide on appropriate action and remit the matter to the Regulator.

Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009

Statutory presumptions of service and receipt apply unless strong evidence to the contrary is provided.

Not explicitly stated, but implied through the Tribunal's reasoning.

Late compliance does not excuse a previous failure to comply on time.

Tribunal's reasoning

Outcomes

The reference is dismissed; the Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN2) is confirmed.

The Employer provided insufficient evidence to overturn the statutory presumption of service and receipt of the Compliance Notice. No reasonable excuse for non-compliance was demonstrated. Late compliance does not negate the penalty.

The matter is remitted to the Regulator.

This is standard procedure following the Tribunal's decision.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.