Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Andy Kimber v The Information Commissioner & Anor

16 August 2023
[2023] UKFTT 675 (GRC)
First-tier Tribunal
Someone complained about a doctor. They then asked for the qualifications of the person who investigated the complaint. The GMC and the Information Commissioner said no, because confirming or denying would reveal who complained, violating the doctor's privacy. The court agreed.

Key Facts

  • Andy Kimber requested information from the General Medical Council (GMC) about the qualifications of the person who investigated a complaint he made against a doctor (referred to as 'person A').
  • The GMC neither confirmed nor denied whether it held the requested information, relying on section 40(5B) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) and data protection principles.
  • The Information Commissioner upheld the GMC's decision.
  • Kimber appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber).

Legal Principles

Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) exemptions, specifically section 40(5B)(a)(i), allows withholding of information if confirmation or denial would contravene data protection principles.

FOIA

Data Protection Act 2018 and UK GDPR Article 5(1)(a): Personal data shall be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner.

UK GDPR and DPA 2018

UK GDPR Article 6(1)(f): Processing of personal data is lawful if necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or a third party, except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject.

UK GDPR

Definition of 'personal data' under DPA 2018, relating to identifiable living individuals.

DPA 2018

Outcomes

The appeal was dismissed.

The Tribunal found that confirming or denying whether the GMC held the requested information would disclose personal data (that a complaint had been made against person A), breaching data protection principles. The legitimate interest in disclosure was outweighed by the data subject's (person A's) right to privacy.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.