Rune Dybedal v The Information Commissioner & Anor
[2024] UKFTT 878 (GRC)
Legal professional privilege (LPP) is a fundamental right, but it can be overridden in specific circumstances.
Various case law authorities (not detailed, per Practice Direction)
Section 42 of FOIA provides an exemption for information subject to LPP, but this exemption applies only to the Duty to Inform and the Duty to Disclose, not to requests from the Commissioner under Section 51.
FOIA 2000, sections 2, 42, 51, 84
Section 51(1)(a) of FOIA empowers the Commissioner to issue an information notice requiring information related to a section 50 application, even if that information is subject to LPP (except as specified in section 51(5)).
FOIA 2000, section 51(1)(a), (5)
The Information Commissioner has a duty to assess the validity of a public authority's application of FOIA exemptions, and this necessarily includes the right to see relevant information, including LPP material (unless specifically excluded under section 51(5)).
Corderoy v Information Commissioner [2017] UKUT 495 (AAC)
The appeal was dismissed.
The Tribunal found that the Information Notice was lawful. Section 51(1)(a) allows the Commissioner to request information, including LPP material (except as specified in 51(5)), relevant to a section 50 complaint. Section 42 does not apply to requests made by the Commissioner under section 51. The withheld information did not fall under the exception in section 51(5).
[2024] UKFTT 878 (GRC)
[2023] UKFTT 900 (GRC)
[2023] UKFTT 511 (GRC)
[2023] UKFTT 916 (GRC)
[2024] UKFTT 756 (GRC)