Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

David Miles v The Information Commissioner

10 November 2023
[2023] UKFTT 955 (GRC)
First-tier Tribunal
Someone complained that the Information Commissioner was slow to deal with their complaint. After they went to court, the Commissioner sorted the problem. The court then said the case was unnecessary and closed it.

Key Facts

  • David Miles (Applicant) made a subject access request (SAR) to Brentwood Ursuline Convent High School (BUCHS).
  • BUCHS's response was unsatisfactory, leading to a complaint to the Information Commissioner (Commissioner).
  • The Commissioner initially failed to progress the complaint, prompting Miles to apply to the Tribunal under section 166(2) DPA.
  • After the Tribunal application, the Commissioner took action, contacting BUCHS and informing Miles.
  • The Commissioner sought to have the Tribunal application struck out.

Legal Principles

A Tribunal can strike out proceedings if there is no reasonable prospect of success.

Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009, rule 8(3)(c)

In determining a realistic prospect of success, the Tribunal must avoid a 'mini-trial'.

HMRC v Fairford Group [2014] UKUT 0329

The Tribunal should consider the interests of justice and balance them with the requirements of rule 2 of the GRC Rules.

AW v Information Commissioner and Blackpool CC [2013] 30 ACC

Section 166 DPA allows the Tribunal to order the Commissioner to take appropriate steps to respond to a complaint if they fail to do so within a timeframe.

Data Protection Act 2018, section 166

An application under section 166(2) DPA does not concern the merits of the underlying complaint, but rather the Commissioner's actions in responding to it. The Commissioner's opinion on appropriateness carries weight.

Killock & Veale v Information Commissioner [2021] UKUT 299 ACC

Outcomes

The application was struck out.

The Commissioner had taken action to address the complaint after the application was made, rendering the application moot. There was no reasonable prospect of success.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.