Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Dr Colin L Leci v The Information Commissioner & Anor

[2024] UKFTT 255 (GRC)
Someone asked the government for information about UK-funded projects in Palestine. The government refused to release some names, saying it would damage relationships with other countries. A court mostly agreed, saying it's more important to protect those relationships than to fully disclose the information. However, some information the government withheld wasn't even part of the request, so they were wrong to withhold that part.

Key Facts

  • Appeal against the Information Commissioner's decision concerning a Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) request.
  • Request for information about projects funded by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) in the occupied Palestinian territories.
  • FCDO withheld information regarding the identities of some project initiators.
  • Appeal concerned the application of FOIA exemptions under sections 27(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), 27(2), 27(3), and 43(2).
  • Tribunal heard closed evidence to protect sensitive information related to UK's international relations.

Legal Principles

FOIA section 27 is a qualified exemption, requiring a public interest balancing test.

FOIA, section 27

Approach to prejudice-based exemptions: identify interests, consider nature and likelihood of prejudice (real, actual, or of substance; real and significant risk).

Hogan v Information Commissioner [2011] 1 Info LR 588; Department for Work and Pensions v Information Commissioner [2017] 1 WLR 1

Appropriate weight must be given to executive branch evidence on prejudice to international relations.

All Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition v Information Commissioner and Ministry of Defence [2011] UKUT 153; FCO v Information Commissioner and Plowden [2013] UKUT 275

Tribunal reviews findings of fact and makes its own decision under FOIA section 58.

FOIA, section 58

Public interest balancing test considers both public interest in disclosure (transparency, accountability) and public interest in maintaining exemption (damage to international relations, UK interests).

Department for Business and Trade v Information Commissioner and Brendan Montague [2023] EWCA 1378

Outcomes

Appeal allowed in part.

FCDO was not entitled to withhold information under section 27(1)(b) as that information was outside the scope of the request. However, FCDO was entitled to withhold information under sections 27(1)(a), 27(1)(c), and 27(1)(d) regarding the identities of some project initiators for Project 7 due to the risk of prejudice to UK international relations and interests.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.