Paul Nicholas Arthur v Information Commissioner
[2023] UKFTT 686 (GRC)
A public authority is not obliged to comply with a FOIA request if the estimated cost exceeds the appropriate limit (£600).
Freedom of Information Act 2000, section 12(1)
In estimating costs, a public authority may only consider costs reasonably expected to be incurred in determining if information is held, locating, retrieving, and extracting it.
Freedom of Information and Data Protection (Appropriate Limit and Fees) Regulations 2004, Regulation 3
The cost estimate must be sensible, realistic, and supported by cogent evidence.
McInerny v IC and Department for Education [2015] UKUT 0047 (AAT)
The test for reasonableness is subjective to the authority but qualified by an objective element allowing the Commissioner and tribunal to remove unreasonable amounts.
Reuben Kirkham v Information Commissioner [2018] UKUT 126 (AAC)
FOIA is not a means of reviewing a public authority’s record-keeping against best practice.
Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v Information Commissioner and Mackenzie [2014] UKUT 479
A public authority's record-keeping practices must be taken as they are, even if defective.
Cruelty Free International v Information Commissioner [2017] UKIT 0318 (AAC)
Section 16 FOIA requires public authorities to offer advice and assistance.
Freedom of Information Act 2000, section 16
The appeal was dismissed.
The Tribunal found the CPS's cost estimate was reasonable, supported by cogent evidence, and that the CPS complied with its section 16 obligations.
[2023] UKFTT 686 (GRC)
[2023] UKFTT 542 (GRC)
[2023] UKFTT 641 (GRC)
[2024] UKFTT 908 (GRC)
[2024] UKFTT 583 (GRC)