Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Kate Sharp v The Information Commissioner & Anor

16 May 2024
[2024] UKFTT 381 (GRC)
First-tier Tribunal
Someone requested emails about a planning application between a councillor and the council. The Information Commissioner said no, citing privacy. The court mostly agreed, but ordered some emails to be released because the council's own rules said that kind of information should usually be public. The councillor's name and contact info remains private.

Key Facts

  • Kate Sharp (Appellant) requested correspondence between Herefordshire Council (Respondent) and Councillor X regarding a planning application.
  • The Information Commissioner (Respondent) upheld the Council's refusal to disclose information, citing personal data protection under Regulation 13(1) EIR and Article 5(1)(a) GDPR.
  • The Appellant appealed, arguing a legitimate interest in knowing if Councillor X used their position to influence the application.
  • The Tribunal considered the Council's policies on publishing planning representations and Councillor X's reasonable expectation of privacy.
  • The Tribunal found that some information constituted representations subject to public disclosure, while other information was private.

Legal Principles

Data protection principles under Article 5(1)(a) GDPR (personal data shall be processed lawfully, fairly, and transparently).

GDPR

Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR), specifically Regulations 5, 12, and 13, regarding access to environmental information and exceptions for personal data.

EIR

Article 6 GDPR outlines lawful bases for data processing, including legitimate interests, but subject to the data subject's fundamental rights.

GDPR

Outcomes

Appeal ALLOWED.

The Tribunal found that some information constituted representations subject to public disclosure under Council policy, outweighing Councillor X's privacy rights. Other information was deemed private and its disclosure unlawful.

Substituted Decision Notice issued.

Herefordshire Council must disclose specified redacted portions of email exchanges between Councillor X and Council officers. The redactions protect Councillor X's personal data (name, email address, contact details) but release information considered public representations.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.