Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Peter Robinson v Information Commissioner

23 October 2023
[2023] UKFTT 881 (GRC)
First-tier Tribunal
Someone asked the government for information. The government said no, calling it a repeat annoying request. A judge disagreed, saying the request was fair and the government must now answer.

Key Facts

  • Peter Robinson (Appellant) requested information from the Department of Finance (DoF) of the Northern Ireland Civil Service Human Resources (NICSHR) on 31 May 2022.
  • The DoF refused the request under sections 14(1) and 14(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA), citing vexatiousness and repetition.
  • The Information Commissioner upheld the DoF's decision.
  • Robinson appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber).

Legal Principles

Section 14(1) FOIA: A public authority does not have to comply with a vexatious request.

Freedom of Information Act 2000

Section 14(2) FOIA: A public authority is not obliged to comply with a substantially similar request unless a reasonable interval has elapsed.

Freedom of Information Act 2000

Definition of 'vexatious': Manifestly unjustified, or involving inappropriate or improper use of a formal procedure. Consider burden on authority, requester's motive, request's value/serious purpose, and harassment/distress to staff. Holistic approach required.

Information Commissioner v Devon CC and Dransfield [2012] UKUT 440 (AAC); [2015] EWCA Civ 454

Tribunal's powers: To allow the appeal if the notice is not in accordance with the law or to substitute a notice; to review findings of fact.

FOIA, section 58

Outcomes

Appeal allowed.

The Tribunal found the request was not burdensome, a disproportionate burden had not been placed on the DoF, the request had adequate justification, and was unlikely to cause disproportionate distress. The request was not vexatious.

Decision Notice IC-191916-Z3Y3 is not in accordance with the law.

The Commissioner's decision to uphold the DoF's refusal based on sections 14(1) and 14(2) of the FOIA was incorrect.

DoF must issue a fresh response to the request, not relying on sections 14(1) and 14(2) of the FOIA, within 35 days.

To ensure compliance with FOIA.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.