Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Stephen Campbell v The Information Commissioner & Anor

23 October 2023
[2023] UKFTT 885 (GRC)
First-tier Tribunal
Someone requested a document from the government. The government said it was too expensive to find. A judge said the government was wrong about the cost and ordered them to give the document, but also said a copy wasn't good enough; they had to give the original file.

Key Facts

  • Stephen Campbell requested a draft of the Amyas Morse Loan Charge Review from HM Treasury (HMT) under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).
  • HMT initially refused the request, citing section 12 of FOIA (exceeding the £600 cost limit) due to the need to search external contractor's mailboxes.
  • The Information Commissioner upheld HMT's refusal.
  • HMT subsequently found the requested information but provided PDF copies instead of the original Word files.
  • Campbell appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber).

Legal Principles

FOIA does not oblige a public authority to comply if the estimated cost exceeds £600.

Freedom of Information and Data Protection (Appropriate Limit and Fees) Regulations 2004

The public authority's cost estimate must be reasonable (sensible, realistic, supported by cogent evidence).

Kirkham v Information Commissioner [2018] UKUT 126 (AAC)

Costs attributable to time spent on locating, retrieving, and extracting information must be estimated at £25 per person per hour, irrespective of actual cost.

Freedom of Information and Data Protection (Appropriate Limit and Fees) Regulations 2004

FOIA entitles a requester to the information itself, not necessarily the original format or the means of its storage.

Smith v Information Commissioner [2022] UKUT 261 (AAC)

Outcomes

The appeal is allowed.

HMT's cost estimate was unreasonable. The Tribunal found that the reliance on section 12 of FOIA was incorrect due to misapplication of the regulations regarding outsourced IT costs and failure to consider alternative sources of the information (document library).

HMT must issue a fresh response.

The fresh response must not rely on section 12 of FOIA and must communicate all data in the requested file, subject to further exemptions.

Providing PDFs was insufficient to comply with the request.

Campbell's request was for the original electronic Word file, not a PDF conversion. While a PDF might suffice in some situations, it does not in this case.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.