Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Benjamin Erridge v The Commissioners for HMRC

[2024] UKFTT 276 (TC)
Mr. Erridge was hit with a big tax bill he didn't understand. The court said he had a good reason for not paying on time because of his dyslexia and HMRC's mistakes. Most of the bill was cancelled, but the court couldn't do anything about how HMRC collected the money or a separate rule that might wipe out the remaining debt. The case shows how tricky tax can be and how some issues need to be dealt with separately.

Key Facts

  • Mr. Erridge was assessed for High Income Child Benefit Charge (HICBC) for tax years 2012-13 to 2018-19, totaling £19,524.98 including penalties.
  • HMRC enforced collection of the full amount before the hearing, forcing Mr. Erridge to sell his family home at a discount.
  • Mr. Erridge is dyslexic and had difficulties understanding complex tax regulations.
  • HMRC initially rejected Mr. Erridge's appeals but later reduced penalties.
  • The Tribunal found Mr. Erridge had a reasonable excuse for not notifying his HICBC liability.
  • The Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to rule on HMRC's debt collection actions or Extra Statutory Concession A19 (ESC A19).

Legal Principles

Reasonable Excuse for Failure to Notify Tax Liability

FA 2008, Sch 41, Para 20; Perrin v HMRC [2018] UKUT 156

Time Limits for Assessments

Taxes Management Act 1970 (TMA), sections 7, 29, 34, 36, 36(1A), 118(2)

HMRC's Power to Issue Discovery Assessments and Time Limits

HMRC v Wilkes [2021] UKUT 150 (TCC)

HMRC's Debt Management and Collection Proceedings

HMRC Compliance Handbook, paragraph CH14300; TMA s 55(3)

Extra Statutory Concession A19 (ESC A19)

ESC A19; HMRC Self Assessment Manual SAM101120; PAYE Manual PAYE95000

Outcomes

Penalties cancelled.

Mr. Erridge had a reasonable excuse for failing to notify his HICBC liability.

HICBC assessments for 2013-14 to 2017-18 cancelled.

Assessments were out of time (more than four years after the end of the tax years).

HICBC assessment for 2018-19 upheld (£2,501).

Assessment was within the four-year time limit.

Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to address HMRC's debt collection practices or application of ESC A19.

These matters require separate action by Mr. Erridge.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.