Ibrahim Amir v The Commissioners for HMRC
[2024] UKFTT 589 (TC)
Three-stage test for late appeals: (1) length of delay, (2) reasons for delay, (3) all circumstances of the case, balancing prejudice to both parties.
Martland v HMRC [2018] UKUT 178 (TCC)
Presumption that statutory time limits should be respected; applicant must justify granting permission to appeal late.
Martland v HMRC [2018] UKUT 178 (TCC)
Significant breach of time limits warrants consideration of all three stages of the Martland test.
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v SS (Congo) and others [2015] ECWCA Civ 387; Romasave (Property Services) Limited v HMRC [2015] UKUT 0254 (TCC)
Failings of a litigant's advisors are generally treated as failings of the litigant.
HMRC v Katib [2019] UKUT 0189 (TCC)
Public interest in observing statutory time limits; allowing late appeals without good reason may encourage disregard of time limits.
Rose v HMRC [2009] UKFTT 189 (TCC)
Permission to appeal out of time refused.
Significant delay (30 days) with no good reason; Appellant's failure to engage with the case and provide necessary information; balancing exercise under Martland favoured HMRC due to inefficiency and lack of evidence.
[2024] UKFTT 589 (TC)
[2024] UKFTT 783 (TC)
[2024] UKFTT 461 (TC)
[2024] UKFTT 884 (TC)
[2024] UKFTT 1031 (TC)