Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

L-L-O Contracting Ltd Ors v The Commissioners for HMRC

13 October 2023
[2023] UKFTT 859 (TC)
First-tier Tribunal
Several people missed the deadline to claim a tax break (MDR). Even though they didn't intentionally miss it, the tax office (HMRC) said they made a 'mistake' and couldn't get the money back. The court agreed with HMRC.

Key Facts

  • Multiple appellants paid SDLT and later claimed Multiple Dwellings Relief (MDR).
  • Claims were made under Sch 10 para 34, not within the 12-month time limit for amending SDLT returns as per s 58D(2) and Sch 10 para 6(3).
  • HMRC refused the claims, citing Sch 10 para 34A Case A (mistake in failing to make a claim).

Legal Principles

MDR must be claimed in an SDLT return or amendment within 12 months.

Finance Act 2003, s 58D(2), Sch 10 para 6(3)

HMRC is not liable to give effect to an overpayment claim (Sch 10 para 34) if it falls under Case A of para 34A (mistake in failing to make a claim).

Finance Act 2003, Sch 10 para 34A

The meaning of 'mistake' in Sch 10 para 34A considers the purpose of the provision; ignorance can constitute a mistake.

R (oao of PACCAR Inc) v Competition Appeal Tribunal [2023] UKSC 28, Finance Act 2003, Sch 10 para 34A

Outcomes

Appeals struck out.

Appellants' claims failed because Case A of Sch 10 para 34A applied. Their failure to claim MDR within the statutory timeframe was a 'mistake', even if unintentional, precluding relief under para 34.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.