Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Nicholas Henderson v The Commissioners for HMRC

8 March 2023
[2023] UKFTT 281 (TC)
First-tier Tribunal
Mr. Henderson tried to claim tax losses on his share trading, saying it was a business. But the judge said it wasn't a real business because he didn't work at it enough, didn't have a proper plan, and wasn't organized like a real trader. He was just investing, not trading.

Key Facts

  • Mr. Henderson, a former partner in a professional firm, bought and sold shares from 2006, initially treating them as capital investments.
  • He inherited a substantial sum in mid-2014 and retired in 2016, intending to focus on share trading.
  • He resumed share trading using an 'execution-only' basis, making his own investment decisions.
  • In the tax years 2015/16, 2016/17, and 2017/18, he made a significant number of share transactions (194 total).
  • He claimed loss relief for losses in 2015/16 and 2016/17. HMRC argued the activities did not constitute a trade or were not commercially undertaken.
  • Mr. Henderson spent approximately 1-2 hours daily researching shares but did not have a formal business plan or rigorous systematic approach.
  • He did not consistently track his income or losses and had not sought tax advice before resuming his share dealing.
  • The maximum funds employed in share dealing at any time did not exceed £100,000.

Legal Principles

Whether an activity constitutes a trade is determined by considering the 'badges of trade' and overall impression, not a rigid definition.

Case law (Jerome Anderson [2018] UKUT 159 (TCC), Salt v Chamberlain [1979] 53 TC 143, Eclipse Film Partners No 35 LLP [2015] STC 1429)

For trade loss relief, the trade must be commercial, carried out on a commercial basis and with a view to profit realisation.

Income Tax Act 2007

In share dealing, the prima facie presumption is that the activity is not a trade; evidence is needed to rebut this.

Salt v Chamberlain [1979] STC 750

Outcomes

Appeal dismissed.

The Tribunal found that Mr. Henderson's share dealing activities did not constitute a trade, but rather the management of a personal investment portfolio. His activities lacked the organisation, commerciality, and time commitment typical of a trade. The number of transactions and time spent were insufficient to establish a trade, despite the substantial losses.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.