Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Roy Bevan v The Commissioners for HMRC

1 July 2024
[2024] UKFTT 586 (TC)
First-tier Tribunal
Someone didn't tell the taxman about rental income from a property they jointly owned. They said they didn't know they had to, but the judge said that's not a good enough reason. They had to pay the penalties, even though they eventually paid the tax itself.

Key Facts

  • Mr. Roy Bevan failed to notify HMRC of his liability to income tax on property letting income for tax years 2006-07 to 2020-21.
  • HMRC issued penalties totaling £1,803.11 under Schedule 41 of the Finance Act 2008.
  • Mr. Bevan argued that he was unaware of the tax implications of jointly owned rental property and that his wife's personal allowance covered the income.
  • The property was purchased in 1999 and let out from February 2007.
  • Mr. Bevan paid the tax due after HMRC contacted him.
  • The appeal focused on whether Mr. Bevan had a reasonable excuse for failing to notify HMRC.

Legal Principles

A penalty for failure to notify tax liability can only be imposed if the taxpayer is in default of a statutory obligation.

Perrin v R & C Comrs [2018] BTC 513

The initial burden of proof is on HMRC to show a prima facie case of default; the taxpayer then bears the burden of proving a reasonable excuse.

Perrin v R & C Comrs [2018] BTC 513

Section 7 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 requires notification of income tax liability.

Taxes Management Act 1970, section 7

Schedule 41 of the Finance Act 2008 provides for penalties for failure to notify.

Finance Act 2008, Schedule 41

The test for 'reasonable excuse' is objective: would a reasonable taxpayer in the same situation have acted differently?

The Clean Car Co. Ltd. v C&E Commissioners [1991] VATTR 234

Ignorance of the law is not a reasonable excuse.

Hesketh & Anor v HMRC [2018] TC 06266, Spring Capital v HMRC [2015] UKFTT 8 (TC), Lau v HMRC [2018] UKFTT 230 (TC), Gilbert v HMRC [2018] UKFTT 437 (TC), Holland v German Property Administrator [1936] 3 All ER 6, Qualaphram Ltd v HMRC [2016] UKFTT 100 (TC)

Special circumstances must be exceptional or unusual to justify a penalty reduction.

Crabtree v Hinchcliffe [1971] 3 All ER 967, Clarks of Hove Ltd v Bakers Union [1979] 1 All ER 152

Outcomes

Appeal dismissed.

The appellant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for not notifying his tax liability. His ignorance of the law, even if honestly held, did not meet the objective standard of a reasonable taxpayer.

Penalties upheld.

HMRC correctly charged the penalties, and the appellant did not meet the threshold for a reasonable excuse or special circumstances to reduce the penalties.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.