Antri Georgiou v The Commissioners for HMRC
[2024] UKFTT 152 (TC)
Parliament's role is to legislate; the Tribunal's role is to construe and apply the law.
Tribunal's explanation to the Appellant
The Tribunal cannot remove a tax charge based solely on unfairness.
HMRC v Hok Ltd [2012] UKUT 363 (TCC)
Definition of 'normally resident' under Article 3(2)(a-c) of the 1992 Order: residing for at least 185 days due to occupational and personal ties.
Customs & Excise Duties (Personal Relief for Goods Permanently Imported) Order 1992
ToR relief criteria under Article 11(1)(a-e) of the 1992 Order: residence, property possession and use, and import date.
Customs & Excise Duties (Personal Relief for Goods Permanently Imported) Order 1992
Exceptional waiver of the 12-month import requirement is possible under Regulation 5 of the 2020 Regulations, if deemed reasonable due to exceptional circumstances.
Customs (Relief from a liability to Import Duty and Miscellaneous Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020
The 12-month import requirement is subject to exceptional waiver (UK Reliefs Document, para 1.5).
UK Reliefs Document (version 1.5)
Lack of knowledge of tax liabilities or ToR relief provisions is not an exceptional circumstance.
Brooks v Revenue & Customs Commissioners [2021] UKFTT 449 (TC) and Ball v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2022] UKFTT 85 (TCC)
Having various storage options for goods upon relocating is not an exceptional circumstance.
Brooks v Revenue & Customs Commissioners [2021] UKFTT 449 (TC) and Ball v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2022] UKFTT 85 (TCC)
Appeal dismissed.
The Appellant did not meet the ToR relief criteria, and no exceptional circumstances justified waiving the 12-month import requirement.
[2024] UKFTT 152 (TC)
[2024] UKFTT 589 (TC)
[2023] UKUT 182 (TCC)
[2024] UKFTT 224 (TC)
[2024] UKFTT 101 (TC)