GB-Gadgets Ltd v The Commissioners for HMRC
[2023] UKFTT 726 (TC)
Jurisdiction of the Tribunal to consider legitimate expectation in appeals under s 83(1)(p) VATA.
KSM Henryk Zeman SP z oo v HMRC [2021] UKUT 182 (TCC)
Principles for determining legitimate expectation: (1) Taxpayer must disclose all relevant information; (2) HMRC's statement must be clear, unambiguous, and unqualified; and (3) HMRC's conduct must be conspicuously or outrageously unfair.
R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte MFK Underwriting Agencies Limited [1990] 1 WLR 1545; R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex parte Unilever Plc [1996] STC 681
Balancing fairness with the public interest in tax collection; high threshold for unfairness to displace presumption of HMRC's right to collect tax.
HMRC v Hely Hutchinson [2017] EWCA Civ 1075; Samarkand Film Partnership No 3 v HMRC [2017] STC 926; Finucane [2019] UKSC 7; R v Northern East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan [2001] QB 213
The unique nature of VAT where the trader is generally regarded as merely collecting tax to be economically borne by others.
Totel v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2018] UKSC 44
Voluntary VAT registration under paragraph 9 of Schedule 1 of VATA.
VATA, Schedule 1, paragraph 9
HMRC's assessment power under s 73 VATA.
VATA, s 73
Right of appeal under s 83 VATA.
VATA, s 83
Appeal allowed; assessment set aside.
The Tribunal found the Appellant had a legitimate expectation, based on HMRC's clear instruction not to charge VAT, that it was not required to collect VAT pending registration. This expectation, coupled with the significantly delayed processing time by HMRC, rendered the assessment conspicuously unfair.
[2023] UKFTT 726 (TC)
[2024] UKFTT 884 (TC)
[2023] UKFTT 892 (TC)
[2023] EWHC 1572 (Admin)
[2024] UKFTT 182 (TC)