Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Vistry Homes Ltd & Anor v The Commissioners for HMRC

23 October 2023
[2023] UKFTT 906 (TC)
First-tier Tribunal
Two companies appealed tax bills. The tax office tried to stop the appeals, saying a similar case was already settled. The judge said that each case was different, and they could still argue their case.

Key Facts

  • HMRC issued VAT assessments to Vistry Homes Ltd (£882,412) and Linden Wates (Westbury) Ltd (£74,768).
  • Appellants (Vistry and Linden) argued for a single zero-rated supply of construction services to housing associations after the 'golden brick' stage, while HMRC contended for two supplies: exempt land and zero-rated construction services.
  • A prior appeal by Linden Limited (previous VAT group representative) concerning the same issue was withdrawn in February 2022.
  • HMRC applied to strike out the appellants' appeals based on cause of action estoppel, issue estoppel, and abuse of process.
  • The 2022 appeals concern different projects and contracts than the withdrawn Linden appeal, although some contractual wording is similar.
  • The Merlin agreement, used in the Linden appeal, was considered representative, but not necessarily exhaustive, by HMRC.

Legal Principles

Cause of action estoppel

Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93

Issue estoppel

Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93; Caffoor v Income Tax Commissioner [1961] AC 584; Littlewoods Retail Ltd v HMRC [2014] EWHC 868 (Ch)

Abuse of process

Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100; Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1

Striking out applications under F-tT Rule 8(3)(c)

Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009; The First De Sales Limited Partnership v HMRC [2018] UKUT 396

VAT nature of supplies; relevance of contractual terms and economic reality

HMRC v Newey [2018] EWCA Civ [2018] STC 1054; HMRC v Newey (Case C-653/11) [2013] STC 2432

Deemed determination of withdrawn appeals

Sections 85(1) and 85(4) VATA

Outcomes

HMRC's application to strike out the appeals was dismissed.

The Tribunal found that neither cause of action estoppel, issue estoppel, nor abuse of process applied. The deemed determination from the withdrawn Linden appeal was limited to the specific Merlin agreement, not to all supplies to housing associations.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.