ABA Motors Limited v The Commissioners for HMRC
[2023] UKFTT 406 (TC)
Hardship in VAT appeals; balancing act between preventing abuse of appeals process and ensuring fair access to appeals.
HMRC v Elbrook (Cash & Carry) Limited [2017] UKUT 181 (TCC)
Hardship test is 'all or nothing'; ability to pay part of the sum is irrelevant.
HMRC v Elbrook (Cash & Carry) Limited [2017] UKUT 181 (TCC)
Test applied to appellant's position at the hearing date; future resources not considered.
HMRC v Elbrook (Cash & Carry) Limited [2017] UKUT 181 (TCC)
Existence of readily available resources does not negate hardship if using them would cause hardship.
HMRC v Elbrook (Cash & Carry) Limited [2017] UKUT 181 (TCC) and Seymour Limousines Limited v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2009] UKVAT V20966
Burden of proof to establish hardship lies with the appellant.
HMRC v Elbrook (Cash & Carry) Limited [2017] UKUT 181 (TCC)
The Tribunal allowed the appellant's hardship application.
The appellant had no immediately or readily available resources to pay the VAT assessment; paying the VAT would cause hardship.
[2023] UKFTT 406 (TC)
[2024] UKFTT 140 (TC)
[2023] UKFTT 621 (TC)
[2024] UKFTT 1010 (TC)
[2024] UKFTT 32 (TC)