Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Farol Holdings Limited & Ors v Clydesdale Bank PLC & Anor

[2024] EWHC 593 (Ch)
Small businesses sued two banks over loan repayments and hidden bank fees. The court decided the banks acted within the loan agreements, and the hidden fees weren't unfair, dismissing the businesses' claims.

Key Facts

  • Four SMEs brought claims against Clydesdale Bank PLC (CB) and National Australia Bank Limited (NAB) regarding fixed interest rate loans (FRTBLs).
  • The claims related to break costs charged on early repayment and the inclusion of undisclosed 'Added Value' (AV) in the fixed interest rate.
  • CB used 'Corresponding NAB Hedges' (CNHs) to transfer interest rate risk to NAB, with break costs mirroring CNH termination payments.
  • The claimants argued that CB lacked contractual entitlement to charge break costs as calculated, and that the Fixed Rate misrepresented the bank's profit.
  • Claims included misrepresentation (fraudulent and negligent), unjust enrichment, breach of contract, and unfair relationship under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

Legal Principles

Contractual interpretation considers the parties' intentions based on a reasonable person's understanding, considering the language, context, and commercial common sense.

Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36

Elements of deceit include a false representation made knowingly, without belief in its truth, or recklessly, intending the representee to rely on it, causing them to act to their detriment.

Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Case 337

Unjust enrichment requires enrichment of the defendant at the claimant's expense, with an unjust factor (e.g., mistake). Change of position can be a defense.

Banca Intesa Sanpaolo SpA v Comune di Venezia [2023] Bus LR 384

An unfair relationship under s.140A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 can arise from terms, enforcement of rights, or other creditor actions; the court considers all relevant factors.

Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance Ltd [2014] UKSC 61

Limitation periods for fraud claims start when the claimant discovers or could reasonably have discovered the fraud. For negligence, a three-year period starts when the claimant has the necessary knowledge.

Limitation Act 1980, sections 32(1)(a) and 14A

Outcomes

All claimants' claims were dismissed.

The court found that CB was contractually entitled to charge break costs as calculated, and that the Fixed Rate did not constitute misrepresentation.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.