Key Facts
- •Roger Ver (14th defendant) applied to set aside orders granting Tulip Trading Limited (TTL) permission to serve him out of the jurisdiction.
- •TTL initially argued a material distinction between Ver and other defendants, but later conceded this point.
- •Andrews LJ granted permission to appeal against previous orders, raising a 'serious issue to be tried'.
- •Master Clark dismissed TTL's application to stay Ver's challenge.
- •Ver's challenge is limited to the 'serious issue to be tried' question.
- •TTL's concerns revolved around potential appeal disruption by Ver.
- •The Court of Appeal appeal hearing is scheduled for December 7th and 8th.
Legal Principles
Balance of prejudice is the main consideration when deciding whether to stay or adjourn proceedings.
Master Clark's judgment [2022] EWHC 2784
A court should not prejudge the outcome of other litigation.
Johns v Solent SD Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 790
The court should take into account the possibility that a Court of Appeal decision may be reversed on appeal.
Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon & others (No 5) [1989] 1 WLR 1244
Unless there is good reason, a reasonable sum on account of costs should be ordered.
CPR rule (implied)
Outcomes
Ver's application to set aside the orders granting TTL permission to serve him out of the jurisdiction is granted.
The court found no good reason to depart from its previous decision, especially as neither party relies on any relevant distinction between Ver and the other defendants. The permission to appeal doesn't automatically mean there is a serious issue to be tried.
Costs of both the claim and the application are to be subject to detailed assessment.
Significant overlap in work between the claim and application makes a separate assessment impractical. Concerns raised about substantial counsel fees also support this.
An interim payment on account of costs of £95,000 is awarded to Ver (approximately 50%).
This figure takes into account the likelihood of costs recovery, difficulty of recovery, TTL's means, prospects of a successful appeal, and the imminence of assessment. An escrow account was deemed unnecessary.