Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Re Safe Hands Plans Limited (in administration)

A funeral plan company went bankrupt. The administrators paid for some funerals even though it meant less money for everyone else. The judge said the trust rules allowed this because it was the right thing to do in a crisis to avoid people having to pay for funerals themselves.

Key Facts

  • Safe Hands Plans Limited (SHPL), a pre-arranged funeral plan provider, entered administration.
  • Significant shortfall existed between trust funds and amounts needed for plan holders' funerals.
  • Administrators arranged for Dignity Funerals Limited to provide funerals, conditionally upon court approval.
  • Approximately 416 funerals were provided under this agreement, costing £615,629.65.
  • The key issue was whether the trust deed allowed using trust funds for funeral payments instead of pari passu distribution.

Legal Principles

Construction of trust deed to determine whether administrators had power to use trust funds for funeral expenses.

Trust Deed dated 6 May 2020

Court's power to approve or sanction trustees' actions, including whether actions are within their powers or a proper exercise of powers.

The Public Trustee and another v Paul Cooper [2001] WTLR 901

Principles of equitable relief as per In re Berkeley Applegate (Investment Consultants) Ltd (In Liquidation) 1 Ch 32.

In re Berkeley Applegate (Investment Consultants) Ltd (In Liquidation) 1 Ch 32

Pari passu distribution principle in insolvent trusts.

Equity Trust (Jersey) Ltd v Halabi [2022] UKPC

Contractual interpretation principles.

Arnold v Britton and others [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] AC 1619

Outcomes

The court approved the use of trust funds to pay Dignity Funerals Limited for the provided funeral services.

The court held that the trust deed allowed the administrators to use the funds under the discretionary power of appointment (Clause 4.8) even in insolvency, to ensure that funerals took place, despite the insolvency provision (Clause 4.6) requiring pari passu distribution. The court considered that the administrators acted reasonably and in the best interests of the beneficiaries given the circumstances.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.