Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

PSN Recruitments Limited v Graeme Ludley & Anor

A worker stole his company's client list and pretended his new business was the old one to steal customers. The court said he was wrong and made him pay for the damage he caused because he broke the rules about keeping company secrets and misrepresenting his business.

Key Facts

  • Mr. Ludley, a recruitment agent, misappropriated confidential client data from his employer, Cosmopolitan Recruitment.
  • He used this data to send an email to over 500 clients misrepresenting his new company, Greenscape, as Cosmopolitan Recruitment.
  • Cosmopolitan Recruitment claimed passing off and breach of confidence.
  • Mr. Ludley destroyed evidence after being contacted by Cosmopolitan Recruitment's solicitors.
  • Cosmopolitan Recruitment experienced a significant downturn in business following Mr. Ludley's actions.

Legal Principles

Passing off requires proof of goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage.

McGregor on Damages 21st edition, Chapter 48

In passing off, damage is presumed if goodwill is interfered with; more than nominal damages require proof of specific losses.

Draper v Trist [1939] 3 All E.R. 513 CA

Breach of confidence in employer-employee relationships is determined by contract terms and implied duties of good faith and fidelity.

Faccenda Chicken v Fowler [1987] Ch 117

Confidential information includes trade secrets and information with a sufficiently high degree of confidentiality; customer lists can be protectable.

Lansing Linde Ltd v Kerr [1991] 1 WLR 251; Marathon Asset Management LLP v Seddon [2017] 2 CLC 182

An equitable duty of confidence arises where information is used inconsistently with its confidential nature and the recipient ought to have appreciated its confidentiality.

Coco v A.N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415; Vestergaard Frandsen A/S v Bestnet Europe Ltd [2013] UKSC 31; Trailfinders Limited v Travel Counsellors Limited and Ors [2020] EWHC 591 (IPEC)

Outcomes

Claimant (Cosmopolitan Recruitment) succeeded in its passing off claim.

The court found that the defendant's misrepresentation caused damage, including loss of profits and reputation, despite the defendant's destruction of evidence.

Claimant succeeded in its breach of confidence claim.

The court held that the client list was confidential information, and the defendant's actions breached both express and implied contractual obligations, as well as the equitable duty of confidence.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.