Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Dr Craig Steven Wright & Ors v BTC Core & Ors

Someone claimed copyright on how Bitcoin data is organized. The judge said no, because that organization is implied by the Bitcoin software, not written down anywhere in the data itself. It's like claiming copyright on the rules of a game just because you invented the game, without writing down those rules in a manual.

Key Facts

  • Dr. Craig Wright claims to be the creator of the Bitcoin system and the author of the Bitcoin White Paper.
  • This case concerns an application for permission to serve a claim outside the jurisdiction.
  • The claim includes allegations of copyright infringement in the Bitcoin File Format.
  • The central issue is whether copyright subsists in the Bitcoin File Format's structure.
  • The court considered the concept of 'fixation' as required for copyright subsistence under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 and relevant case law.
  • The Bitcoin File Format is described as a structured data format within Bitcoin blocks.

Legal Principles

Copyright subsists in a literary work only if and until it is recorded in writing or otherwise (fixation).

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, Section 3(2)

For copyright to subsist, the subject matter must be original and expressed in a manner that makes it identifiable with sufficient precision and objectivity.

Case C-310/17 Levola Hengelo BV v Smilde Foods BV

Functionality of a computer program, programming language, and data file format are not forms of expression protected by copyright under the Software Directive.

Case C-406/10 SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd

A data file format may be protected by copyright if it contains content, not just structure.

[Technomed Ltd v Bluecrest Health Screening Ltd and Software Solutions Ltd v 365 Health and Wellbeing Ltd]

Outcomes

Permission to serve the claim outside the jurisdiction was granted, except for the copyright claim relating to the Bitcoin File Format.

The court found no serious issue to be tried regarding copyright subsistence in the Bitcoin File Format because the structure was not fixed in a material form within the Bitcoin blocks. The structure is implied by the software, not explicitly defined within the block data.

Permission to appeal was refused.

The court's decision was based on its finding that there was no serious issue to be tried regarding the copyright claim, not on a novel point of law.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.