Key Facts
- •Mr. Webster persistently issued claims and made applications deemed totally without merit.
- •Three civil restraint orders (CROs) were previously issued against Mr. Webster.
- •The current application concerns an extension of an existing extended civil restraint order (ECRO).
- •The underlying disputes relate to the will of Valerie St John Webster and the consequences thereof, including Mr. Webster's eviction from The Priory and subsequent disputes concerning Bondip Farmhouse.
- •Mr. Webster's actions were described as obsessive and failing to accept court orders.
- •Mr. Webster engaged in correspondence containing allegations and threats against the applicants.
- •The court considered the necessity of protecting litigants from vexatious proceedings and protecting court resources.
Legal Principles
The court's power to make and extend civil restraint orders is found in CPR 3.11 and Practice Direction 3C.
CPR 3.11, Practice Direction 3C
An extended CRO may be made where a party has persistently issued claims or made applications that are totally without merit (at least three occasions).
Practice Direction 3C, paragraph 3.1
The test for extending an ECRO (paragraph 3.10) is distinct from the initial imposition of an order (paragraph 3.1). The test for extension is whether it's appropriate, considering the need to protect litigants from vexatious proceedings and protect court resources.
Practice Direction 3C, paragraphs 3.1 and 3.10; Ashcroft v Webster [2017] EWHC 887 (Ch); AEY v AL [2020] EWHC 3539 (Fam); Hurst v Green [2022] EWHC 2895 (Ch); Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset v Gray [2019] EWCA Civ 1675
Outcomes
The ECRO against Mr. Webster is extended for a further two years.
Mr. Webster's persistent issuance of claims and applications deemed totally without merit, his obsessive approach, and his continued disregard for court orders justify the extension to protect the applicants and court resources.
Mr. Webster is ordered to pay costs of £14,000.
Costs are assessed on a standard basis, considering the straightforward nature of the application, Mr. Webster's partial success, and proportionality.