Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Lightsource BP Renewable Energy Investments Holdings Ltd (Re The Companies Act 2006)

21 October 2024
[2024] EWHC 2648 (Ch)
High Court
A big company (Lightsource BP) is splitting up its US part and selling the rest to another big company (BP). A judge checked everything was done properly according to company law rules and made sure everyone got a fair deal, then approved the plan.

Key Facts

  • Scheme of arrangement under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006.
  • Demerger of US assets (US Assets) held by Lightsource Renewable Energy US, LLC (LSBP US).
  • Acquisition of remaining shares in Lightsource BP Renewable Energy Investments Holdings Limited (the Company) by BP Alternative Energy Investments Limited (BP).
  • Creation of a new joint venture company to hold the demerged US Assets.
  • Reduction of capital necessary to effectuate the scheme.
  • Unanimous shareholder approval at the court meeting (excluding BP, who consented).
  • No objections from shareholders who didn't attend the meeting.
  • Minor concerns addressed regarding drafting and timing, but no material impact on the scheme.

Legal Principles

Four conditions for approving a scheme of arrangement: (A) statutory compliance; (B) fair representation of shareholders; (C) reasonable approval by an intelligent and honest shareholder; (D) no 'blot' on the scheme.

Re TDG plc [2009] 1 BCLC 445

Court cannot confirm reduction of capital before Part I of the scheme is complete.

Re TIP-Europe Limited [1988] BCLC 231

Section 641(2A) Companies Act 2006 prohibition on capital reduction in schemes where a person acquires all shares does not apply in this case.

Edwin Johnson J's judgment (referenced)

Court will not, as a matter of discretion, sanction a scheme confirming a capital reduction if the transaction could be effected without court intervention (Re Rylands-Whitecross Limited principle). This principle did not apply here.

Re Rylands-Whitecross Limited (21 December 2023 - unreported)

Five conditions for approving a capital reduction: (1) valid special resolution; (2) equitable treatment of shareholders; (3) proper explanation to shareholders; (4) discernible purpose; (5) no prejudice to creditors.

Sections 641 onwards of the Companies Act 2006; Re Ratners Group Plc [1988] BCLC 685; Re Thorn EMI Plc [1989] BCLC 613

Outcomes

Scheme of arrangement approved.

All statutory requirements met; no evidence of coercion or bad faith; commercially rational transaction; minor concerns addressed.

Associated reduction of capital approved.

All requirements for capital reduction met; valid special resolution; equitable treatment of shareholders; proper explanation; discernible purpose; no prejudice to creditors.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.