ZR v TP
[2023] EWHC 3407 (Fam)
Relocation cases are amongst the most troubling and important cases in private law proceedings, often finely balanced, considering the impact on both parents and children.
This case
Children's wishes are not determinative, particularly when difficult to ascertain due to communication difficulties.
This case
The court must consider the welfare checklist in relocation cases, weighing factors such as the impact on the child's relationship with the absent parent.
This case
An appeal court will only overturn a lower court's decision if the judge considered an irrelevant matter, failed to consider a relevant matter, erred in law, or reached a plainly wrong conclusion.
This case
The appeal was dismissed.
While the judge should have given more weight to the disruption of the father-child relationship, the decision was within the judge's discretion, considering the mother's isolation, the father's history of abuse, and the mother's proposed plan for maintaining contact.
Mother agreed to remove the supervision requirement by July 1, 2026, provided the father completes a parenting course and contact occurs in England in 2025.
To address concerns about maintaining contact with the father post-relocation and the difficulties of removing supervision from Canada.