B v A Local Authority & Ors
[2023] EWFC 154 (B)
Court's control of expert evidence and assessment in children's proceedings is governed by s.13 Children and Families Act 2014 (CFA).
Children and Families Act 2014
Court must have regard to the overriding objective (FPR 1) and the power to revoke an earlier direction for assessment (FPR 4.1(7)).
Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR)
In making placement orders, the paramount consideration is the child's welfare throughout their life, undertaking a global, holistic evaluation of all options (Re B-S (Children) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146).
Re B-S (Children) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146
The obligation to explore family options is not weakened by geography, but delays caused by assessing family members abroad may conflict with a child's timescales (London Borough of Tower Hamlets v D, E, F [2014] EWCH 3901 (Fam)).
London Borough of Tower Hamlets v D, E, F [2014] EWCH 3901 (Fam)
The phrase 'nothing else will do' (Re B) must be tied to the child's welfare and used only after a comprehensive welfare evaluation of all pros and cons (Re W (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 793). There is no presumption or right for a child to be brought up by natural family.
Re W (A Child) [2016] EWCA Civ 793
The court discharged the order for the assessment of the maternal aunt.
The significant delays (at least 9 months) in obtaining the assessment, coupled with the uncertainty of a positive outcome and the potential for further delays even if positive, would be detrimental to A's welfare. The court prioritised finding a permanent placement for A as swiftly as possible.