W v N-F
[2023] EWFC 302 (B)
Parents must have a proper opportunity to prepare and argue their cases.
Case law and inherent fairness.
Orders removing children require proper notice, except in cases of serious physical or sexual harm.
Case law and Children Act 1989.
Even with risk of emotional harm, summary removal is not justified without considering alternatives.
Judge's interpretation of the facts and legal principles.
Court must consider alternatives before making a draconian order like transfer of residence.
Judge's interpretation of the facts and principles of fairness.
When dealing with unrepresented parents, the court should explain their rights.
Judge's interpretation of the principles of fairness and procedural justice.
Appeal allowed.
Unfair procedure; inadequate opportunity to prepare and argue case; questionable decision-making.
Interim care order set aside.
Procedure was unfair and did not justify the order.
Week-about shared care arrangement ordered.
Balances father's concerns with mother's willingness to share care; maintains progress made.
Matter to be reviewed by Lieven J on July 22.
Further assessment needed before final order.
[2023] EWFC 302 (B)
[2024] EWFC 216 (B)
[2024] EWHC 2578 (Fam)
[2023] EWCA Civ 686
[2024] EWHC 2236 (Fam)