Valencia Waste Management Ltd, R (on the application of) v Environment Agency
[2024] EWHC 939 (Admin)
Venue in judicial review proceedings should be the Administrative Court office for the region most closely connected to the claim (CPR PD54C §2.1), unless the proceedings fall within an excepted class in §3.1.
CPR PD54C
Proceedings to which Part 76 or Part 79 applies (including those involving a special advocate) are excepted classes of claim, generally requiring transfer to London (CPR PD54C §3.1(1)(d)).
CPR PD54C §3.1(1)(d)
The overriding objective requires consistent interpretation and application of Practice Directions.
Implicit in the judgment
The court has jurisdiction to determine venue, even if a Practice Direction suggests a specific location; a 'jurisdictional straitjacket' is not required (referencing R (Valencia Waste Management Ltd) v Environment Agency [2024] EWHC 939 (Admin)).
R (Valencia Waste Management Ltd) v Environment Agency [2024] EWHC 939 (Admin)
The application to transfer the proceedings to London was refused.
The application was made too late, the case had been managed in Manchester throughout, and a suitable hearing date in Manchester was readily found. The court found no compelling reason for transfer despite the potentially applicable provisions of CPR PD54C §3.1(1)(d).
The hearing date was changed to 28 October 2024 in Manchester.
This resolved the delay issue raised by the Secretary of State.
[2024] EWHC 939 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 540 (Admin)
[2023] EWHC 3216 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 694 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 1851 (Admin)