Caselaw Digest
Caselaw Digest

Global Feedback Limited, R (on the application of) v His Majesty’s Treasury & Anor

[2024] EWHC 1810 (Admin)
An environmental charity sued the government over a trade deal with Australia, arguing it would increase climate-damaging emissions. The court agreed the charity's concerns were serious enough to warrant a full hearing of the case.

Key Facts

  • Global Feedback Limited (claimant), an environmental charity, challenged the Customs Tariff (Preferential Trade Arrangements and Tariff Quotas) (Australia) (Amendment Regulations 2023) (the 2023 regulations).
  • The 2023 regulations implemented the UK's obligations under a free trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, reducing import duties on Australian agricultural goods.
  • The claimant argued that the regulations would lead to increased greenhouse gas emissions due to higher emissions intensity in Australian beef production and increased consumption of Australian beef in the UK.
  • The claimant challenged the defendants' (HM Treasury and the Secretary of State for Business and Trade) failure to conduct a comprehensive impact assessment of carbon leakage.
  • The claim involved consideration of the UK's obligations under the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement.

Legal Principles

Duty of adequate inquiry (Tameside duty)

Case law (implied)

Irrationality review

Case law (implied)

Section 28, Taxation (Cross Border Trade) Act 2018: Requirement to have regard to international obligations

TCTA 2018

Article 4(1)(f) UNFCCC: Climate change considerations in relevant policies and actions

UNFCCC

Section 31(3D) Senior Courts Act 1981: High likelihood of no substantial difference in outcome

SCA 1981

Admissibility of expert evidence in judicial review

R (Law Society) v Lord Chancellor [2019] EWHC 2094 (Admin)

Standard of proof for section 31(3D) Senior Courts Act 1981

R (Cava Bien Limited) v Milton Keynes Council [2021] EWHC 3003 (Admin)

Outcomes

Permission for judicial review granted on all grounds.

The claimant's grounds of challenge were deemed arguable, particularly regarding the defendants' failure to adequately assess carbon leakage and their consideration of international climate change obligations.

Claimant's expert evidence admitted.

The court found the expert evidence met the criteria for admissibility in judicial review claims.

Amendments to the Statement of Facts and Grounds allowed.

The court permitted the claimant to amend its statement to incorporate further details and clarify certain points.

Similar Cases

Caselaw Digest Caselaw Digest

UK Case Law Digest provides comprehensive summaries of the latest judgments from the United Kingdom's courts. Our mission is to make case law more accessible and understandable for legal professionals and the public.

Stay Updated

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest case law updates and legal insights.

© 2025 UK Case Law Digest. All rights reserved.

Information provided without warranty. Not intended as legal advice.