HM Assistant Coroner for Inner London Court, Re
[2024] EWHC 1085 (Admin)
Section 13 of the Coroners Act 1988 allows the High Court to quash an inquest and order a new one if it's necessary or desirable in the interests of justice due to factors like fraud, rejection of evidence, irregularity, insufficient inquiry, or new evidence.
Coroners Act 1988, s.13
In determining whether a new inquest is necessary or desirable, courts consider the possibility of a different verdict, the number of shortcomings in the original inquest, and new evidence that wasn't previously investigated. A different verdict isn't a precondition; the public revelation of evidence confirming the original verdict might be sufficient.
R (on the application of) Sutovic v HM Coroner Northern District of Greater London [2006] EWHC 1095 (Admin); Attorney General v Coroner of South Yorkshire (West) & Anor [2012] EWHC 3783 (Admin)
The wishes of the deceased's family are a relevant factor, but not determinative.
Inquest into the Death of Michael Vaughan [2020] EWHC 3670 (Admin)
The original inquest and its findings were quashed.
The newly discovered evidence (hospital records and notes indicating a possible suicide attempt seven weeks before death) created the possibility of a different conclusion, making a new inquest desirable in the interests of justice, even considering the family's wishes and the delay.
A new inquest was ordered before a different coroner in the same area.
To ensure impartiality and a fresh consideration of the evidence.
[2024] EWHC 1085 (Admin)
[2023] EWHC 3476 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 2007 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 2673 (Admin)
[2024] EWHC 1275 (Admin)